| 0202.1 |
Call to Order:
Mr. Cottle, Chair, called the Public Session of the Board of Retirement
to order at 1:00 p.m., February 26, 2002 in SamCERA's Board Room, Suite
280, 702 Marshall, Redwood City. |
| 0202.2 |
Roll Call:
Mr. Bryan, Mr. Buffington, Ms. Colson, Mr. Cottle, Mr. Lewis, Mr. McMahon,
Ms. Salas, Ms. Stuart & Ms. Tonsfeldt. Ms. Arnott sat for Mr. Buffington
from 4:00 p.m. to adjournment. Staff: Mr. McCausland, Ms. Manning,
Mr. Clifton & Mr. Hood. Counsel: Ms. Carlson. Consultants:
Ms. Chapman, Ms. Jadallah, Mr. Thomas & Mr. Yeung. Retirees 10,
Actives 1, County 1. |
| 0202.3 |
Approval of the Minutes: Motion by Stuart, second
by Lewis, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the January 8,
2002 Special Meeting of the Board of Retirement as submitted.
Motion by Stuart, second by Lewis, carried unanimously, to approve
the Minutes of the January 15, 2002 Special Joint Closed Session Meeting
of the Board of Retirement and Board of Supervisors as submitted.
Ms. Arnott submitted the following correction to 020122.d¶2, line
2 ""...in most respects it..." Motion by
Stuart, second by Lewis, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of
the January 22, 2002 Meeting of the Board of Retirement as corrected.
|
| 0202.4.1 |
Oral Communications from the Board: Mr. McMahon
reported that he had participated in the Winter Roundtable of the Pacific
Pension Institute and found its off-the-record presentations by international
experts to be extremely candid, insightful and informative.
- Ms. Salas reported that she had participated in the CALAPRS Trustees
Roundtable and found the discussions on asset allocation and shareholder
litigation very beneficial. She noted that LACERA recovers ~$2 million
per year from class action suits.
- Ms. Colson noted that the National Association of Securities Professionals
will be meeting in San Francisco in June and that she has been asked
to be a presenter. Without objection, Mr. Cottle instructed Mr.
McCausland to place the NASP meeting on the March Agenda for the Board's
approval.
|
| 0202.4.2 |
Oral Communications
From the Public: None |
| 0202.5 |
BENEFIT SERVICES |
| 0202.5.1 |
Adoption of Consent Calendar: Motion by Stuart,
second by Salas, carried unanimously, to adopt the Consent Calendar as
submitted, as follows:
The Board (a) finds that Margarita Krebs is unable to perform
her usual and customary duties as a Custodian, (b) denies her application
for Service-connected Disability, and (3) grants her a Non-Service Connected
Disability.
The Board ratifies the following actions taken by staff pursuant to the
Board's Delegation of Authority and the Regulations of the Board
of Retirement:
| Service Retirements: |
| Nguyen, Thanh |
January 19, 2002
|
Human Services Agency
|
| Hunter, Carl |
January 21, 2001
|
Public Works
|
| Newton, Douglas |
January 31, 2002 (from deferred)
|
Sheriff's Office
|
| Glave, Victoria |
March 1, 2002
|
Human Services Agency
|
| Halbert, Gaylen |
March 2, 2002 (from deferred)
|
Probation
|
| Levine, Daniel S. |
March 25, 2002 (from deferred)
|
General Hospital
|
| Chase, Miriam |
March 27, 2002 (from deferred)
|
Mental Health
|
| Jones, Jonathan |
March 28, 2001
|
Superior Court
|
| Albrecht, Yvonne |
March 30, 2002
|
Health Services
|
| Fraser, Mary |
March 30, 2002
|
Superior Court
|
| Todd, Shirley |
March 30, 2002
|
Municipal Court
|
| |
| Beneficiary Continuance of Benefits: |
| Fairbanks, Carole |
|
Beneficiary of Verle
|
| Fernelius, Betty |
|
Beneficiary of Keith
|
| Woonacott, Richard |
|
Beneficiary of Dolores
|
| |
| Deferred Retirements: |
| Price, Barbara |
Plan 3 vested
|
|
| Racansky, Igor |
Plan 3 vested
|
|
| Brasseur, Thomas |
G2 vested
|
|
| Mahe, Paula |
G1 vested
|
|
| Ferrero, Jill |
G4 non-vested
|
Reciprocity
|
| Caso, Michael |
G2 vested
|
Reciprocity
|
| Underwood, Paul |
G4 non-vested
|
Reciprocity
|
| |
| Active Death Benefits: |
| Rubin, Chester |
October 25, 2001
|
|
| Moore, Roger |
November 21, 2001
|
|
| Rosado, Christina |
January 10, 2002
|
|
| |
| Withdrawal Refunds: |
| Azzopardi, Nikole |
G4 non-vested
|
$330.80
|
| Blanco, Zuleima |
G4 non-vested
|
$59.80
|
| Caballero, Patricia |
G4 non-vested
|
$6,559.17
|
| Casares, Michelle |
Quadro
|
$21,246.12
|
| Gonzalez, Xiomara |
G4 non-vested
|
$4,235.18
|
| Jackson, Lamont |
Beneficiary of Betty Jackson
|
$8,307.41
|
| Jacobsen, Martha |
S4 non-vested
|
$6,437.45
|
| Moore, John |
Beneficiary of Roger Moore
|
$74,569.68
|
| Nand, Praveena |
G4 non-vested
|
$206.87
|
| Petitt, William |
S4 non-vested
|
$3,304.40
|
| Quiaoit, Floreida |
G2 vested
|
$48,808.10
|
| Tassara, Kimberly |
S4 non-vested
|
$4,879.97
|
| Zimmerman, Steve |
G4 non-vested
|
$5,109.21
|
| |
|
| TOTAL FOR FEBRUARY: |
$184,054.16
|
| |
| Withdrawal Rollovers: |
| Borillo, Fe |
G4 non-vested
|
$8,213.40
|
| Chang, Jacquelyn |
G4 non-vested
|
$9,054.12
|
| Chen-Lee, Jacqueline |
G4 non-vested
|
$5,179.31
|
| Coria, Rene |
G4 non-vested
|
$8,501.98
|
| Dondero, Allison |
G4 non-vested
|
$2,456.86
|
| Nubla, Carmela |
G4 non-vested
|
$2,498.09
|
| Pereyda, Margarita |
G2 vested
|
$32,370.28
|
| Richardson, Annie |
G4 non-vested
|
$3,597.83
|
| |
|
|
TOTAL FOR FEBURARY:
|
$71,871.87
|
|
| |
|
| 0202.5.2 |
Consideration of items removed from Consent Calendar: None.
|
| |
|
| 0202.5.3 |
Review of SamCERA's Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement Policy:
Mr. McCausland provided an overview of Agenda Items 5.3 - 5.7 for those
in the audience. [See 020122.5.6 for a comprehensive overview.]
Paul Scannell, Assistant County Manager, noted that Agenda Items 5.3-5.7
represent a very intricate plan to preserve the Medicare Part-B Premium
Reimbursement Program. He noted that the plan is complex, but that certain
elements of the plan can be implemented now to preserve Medicare Part-B
reimbursements for at least the next year.
Mr. Scannell reviewed the history of the Ventura Contingency Reserve.
He noted that the funding for the Reserve was diverted from employer reserves
and that all interest earned on those funds should also be treated as
funds diverted from the employer reserves. He noted that it was the Board's
explicit policy to use the Reserve to pay for the expenses related to
Ventura and then to revert any balances to employer reserves. He
noted that Agenda Items 5.3-5.7 represent a change in that policy by characterizing
the Reserve as "excess earnings" that can be used for the payment
of ad hoc benefits.
Mr. Scannell noted that he understands the statutory basis in the '37
Act for creating "excess earnings." However, he emphasized that
he knows intuitively that there are no true excess earnings when the fund
is falling well below its 8.25% actuarial interest rate target in the
current investment environment.
Mr. Scannell noted that the disappointing investment returns of recent
years will result in increases in the County's contributions as those
less than expected returns work their way through the actuarial smoothing
process. Consequently, anything that diverts funds from the actuarial
valuation assets will exacerbate an already difficult problem. Mr. Yeung
noted that actuarial smoothing should permit SamCERA to credit interest
to all reserves, even when the current year's returns are negative. Mr.
Scannell noted that smoothing would eventually catch up with SamCERA,
which will force increases in the employers' contribution rates.
Mr. Scannell reviewed the history of the Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement
Program. He noted that the resolution implementing the program in 1998
stated that the funding would not increase the cost to the County, yet
the actions the Board must contemplate today will increase the cost to
the County by approximately 0.06% per year through December 31, 2011.
Mr. Scannell also noted that retirees have come to rely on the Medicare
Part-B Premium Reimbursement Program and that its discontinuance would
create a significant hardship for many. Therefore, Mr. Scannell recommended
that the Board transfer sufficient funds from the Ventura Contingency
Reserve to continue the program for the coming year.
Mr. Scannell encouraged the Board to defer action on the other items
until Ventura costs become clear and the markets are stronger.
He urged the Board not to lock itself into a multi-year funding mechanism
based on diverting funds from the Ventura Contingency Reserve.
Mr. McCausland noted that Mr. Scannell's analysis was very thoughtful.
He noted that the Ventura Contingency Reserve is not a valuation
asset and that if it is not credited with interest there will be more
money to credit to employer reserves, which are valuation assets. Consequently,
he urged the Board not to defer action on the Interest Crediting Policy
resolution. Mr. McCausland noted that with modifications the Ventura
Contingency Reserve Policy could accommodate Mr. Scannell's concerns.
Mr. McCausland recommended that the Board table consideration of the creation
of an Ad Hoc Benefits Reserve as an additional accommodation of Mr. Scannell's
concerns.
Mr. Cottle then instructed Mr. McCausland to introduce Agenda Item 5.3
- Review of SamCERA's Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement Policy.
Mr. Cottle noted that the Board has received no negative comments regarding
reaffirmation of the Board's Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement Policy.
Mr. Bryan noted that Mr. Scannell had articulated a very responsible position
and he agreed that the Board did not need to create a multi-year funding
mechanism at this time. Ms. Stuart noted that this is a very important
benefit to SamCERA's retirees.
Motion by Stuart, second by Bryan, carried unanimously to reaffirm
the Board's Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement Policy as set forth
in Resolution 97-98-11, Establishing a Retiree Medical Benefits
Program, and to recommend that the Board of Supervisors appropriate
funds to continue the program in fiscal year 2002-2003.
Ms. Stuart extended the thanks and gratitude of the retirees in attendance
from SCORPA for the Board's continued support for the program.
|
| |
|
| 0202.5.4 |
Adoption of Amendments to SamCERA's Litigation
Contingency Reserve Policy: Mr. McCausland submitted changes to the
draft resolution (1) to delete reference to an Ad Hoc Benefits Reserve
and (2) to provide for a transfer of one-year's Medicare Part-B Premium
Reimbursement funding on June 30, 2002.
Mr. McCausland noted that, while he strongly recommends adoption of this
policy, the Board does have the authority to simply continue its current
practice and force-feed the 401(h) account per the terms of its Interest
Crediting Policy.
Mr. Yeung noted that the proposed policy places less of a burden on the
County, because rather than diverting funds from the current year's investment
income stream, the 401(h) funding will come from prior year earnings.
Consequently, the proposed policies permit an additional ~$1.3 million
to flow through to the valuation assets.
In response to a question from Mr. Buffington, Mr. McCausland noted that
the Ventura Contingency Reserve was created through the reversal
of interest that had been credited to employer reserves, thereby recasting
them as "excess earnings" per the '37 Act. In response to a
question from Mr. Lewis, Mr. McCausland noted that the '37 Act only permits
the payment of ad hoc benefits from "excess earnings," hence
the finding in the resolution that the Ventura Contingency Reserve
consists of excess earnings. In response to a question from Mr. Buffington,
Mr. McCausland noted that the Board has the authority to credit 100% of
excess earnings to employer reserves, if it has no intent to fund ad hoc
benefits.
In response to a question from Ms. Colson, Mr. McCausland noted that
the reason for suspending the crediting of interest to the Ventura
Contingency Reserve is so that more funds will be available to credit
to the valuation assets.
In response to a question from Ms. Tonsfeldt, Ms. Carlson noted that
there was no new information on the Fund's Ventura exposure, but
that the timing for the filing of briefs had been accelerated. Mr. Lewis
noted that the actuarial study proposed in Agenda Item 7.13 would provide
many of the answers that the Board would benefit from having before it
today. On the recommendation of Ms. Colson, draft language relating to
the cost of Ventura was deleted from the proposed resolution.
On instruction from Mr. Cottle, Mr. McCausland and the actuaries diagramed
the flow of funds for the Board. Ms. Colson noted that the proposed resolution
as amended suspends the crediting of interest to the Ventura Contingency
Reserve, deletes reference to the cost of Ventura and makes a one-year
appropriation to the Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement Program.
Mr. Scannell noted that at some point the piper will have to be paid,
but he concurred with the amendments to the draft resolution, given Mr.
Yeung's explanation of the benefits of the proposed policy. Mr. Bryan
noted that the proposed policy is more explicit than the current policy.
Motion by Bryan, second by Salas, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution 01-02-03, Ventura Contingency Reserve Policy,
as follows:
WHEREAS, Board Resolution 99-00-08 established the Ventura
Contingency Reserve, as follows:
Resolved that the Board hereby establishes a Litigation Contingency
Reserve to receive any employer contributions received in excess of
those required to actuarially fund the system as determined utilizing
the actuarial assumptions adopted herein; such excess contributions
to be credited against the actuarial liability incurred pursuant to
the final judgement in Teamsters Local 856 vs the Board of Retirement.
And
WHEREAS, William M. Mercer initiated the Ventura Contingency
Reserve with a transfer of $32,145,000 effective with the June 30,
1999 Actuarial Valuation; and
WHEREAS, the $32,145,000 transferred to the Ventura Contingency
Reserve was investment income that would have otherwise been credited
as interest to employer reserves per Resolution 98-99-20, hence such funds
constituted excess earnings as defined by GC§31592.2 &
GC§31592.4; and
WHEREAS, interest has been credited to the Ventura Contingency
Reserve since its inception; and
WHEREAS, the Ventura Contingency Reserve is not included
within the Valuation Assets for the purpose of calculating required contribution
rates or funding status and, therefore, has a negative impact on both;
and
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to revise and clarify its Ventura
Contingency Reserve Policy. Therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Board hereby reaffirms that the Ventura Contingency
Reserve is reserved for the exclusive purpose of providing funding
for the payment of expenses and enhanced benefits resulting from compensation
issues that remained unresolved following the Supreme Court's decision
in Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Association v. Board of Retirement
of Ventura County... Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby suspends the crediting of contributions
and interest to the Ventura Contingency Reserve. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby transfers on June 30, 2002 to the
401(h) Account the difference between $1,340,000 and the balance in said
Account from interest credited to the Ventura Contingency Reserve
prior to the adoption of this resolution. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby declares its intent to transfer
any unencumbered balance of the Ventura Contingency Reserve to
employer reserves upon final resolution of Teamsters Local 856 vs.
the Board of Retirement. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes the Chief Executive
Officer to implement the provisions of this resolution.
|
| |
|
| 0202.5.5 |
Adoption of Ad Hoc Benefits Reserve Policy: Without objection,
Mr. Cottle indefinitely tabled consideration of the proposed ad hoc benefits
reserve policy.
|
| |
|
| 0202.5.6 |
Adoption of Amendments to SamCERA's Interest Crediting
Policy: Mr. McCausland revised the draft amendments to reflect the
Board's actions in Agenda Items 5.3 and 5.4.
Mr. Buffington questioned the need to credit member reserves at the actuarial
interest rate, since the only time the interest matters to members is
if they withdraw their funds. Mr. Bryan reminded Mr. Buffington that the
Board had earlier agreed to credit member reserves at the actuarial interest
rate and to give the County the full benefit of all other earnings. Mr.
McCausland noted that members have no control over the investment of their
funds nor any access to the employer's contributions and that refunds
for the last five years ranged between $1.6 million and $1.8 million,
or ~0.14% of the Fund per year. Consequently, crediting member reserves
with the actuarial interest rate has a nearly unquantifiable impact on
the employer contribution rates.
In response to questions from Mr. Scannell, Mr. McCausland noted that
the actuary has generated a spreadsheet that is used to estimate the December
31st smoothed return and that Steps (d) and (e) could be consolidated
with no adverse impact on the employer reserves. Mr. Yeung noted that
Step (d) is used to clearly identify whether or not a Fund has earned
its actuarial interest rate. In other Counties Step (d) is critical to
the funding of ongoing ad hoc benefit programs, but Step (d) is not that
important to SamCERA where Step (c) provides the funding for Medicare
Part-B.
In response to a question from Mr. Lewis, Mr. McCausland noted that Step
(d) was the critical factor that caused him to evaluate the situation
and prepare Agenda Items 5.3-5.7 for the Board's consideration. He noted
that he had been concerned that, if all reserves were credited with 4.125%
on December 31, 2001, there was a strong possibility that the amount credited
would exceed the total earnings for the fiscal year, thereby eliminating
any reasonable basis for finding that "excess earnings" were
available for the continued funding of Medicare Part-B.
Motion by Stuart, second by Salas, carried unanimously, to amend
Resolution 98-99-20, Interest Crediting Rate Policy, as
follows:
WHEREAS, Government Code §31591 states, in part, that regular
interest shall be credited semiannually on June 30th and December 31st
to all contributions in the retirement fund which have been on deposit
for six months immediately prior to such date...; &
WHEREAS, Government Code §31592 provides that earnings
of the retirement fund during any year in excess of the total interest
credited to contributions and reserves during such year shall remain in
the fund as a reserve against deficiencies in interest earnings in other
years, losses on investments and other contingencies...; &
WHEREAS, Government Code §31453 provides that with respect
to the rates of interest to be credited to members and to the county or
district, the board may, in its sound discretion, recommend a rate which
is higher or lower than the interest assumption rate established by the
actuarial survey; &
WHEREAS, The May 23, 1996 Board Minutes, provide for the implementation
of Governmental Accounting Standard #25, as follows:
(1) to use the fair market value of assets for the Statement of
Net Plan Assets, (2) to use the actuarial value of assets as the accounting
basis for the '37 Act mandated reserves included in the required GAS
25 footnote, (3) to add a Market Stabilization item to the reserves
footnote to balance with the fair market value of assets, (4) to set
aside 1% of the fair market value of assets as the Unallocated Fund
Balance at the end of each fiscal year, (5) to use the net earnings
on the actuarial value of assets for the purpose of recommending to
the Board the amount available for the crediting of "interest"
to the reserves and (6) to credit all "interest" to all reserves
on a dollar weighted basis; &
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to clarify its interest crediting policy
as set forth in Resolution 97-98-21. Therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes the Chief Executive
Officer to calculate the net earnings of the Retirement Fund based upon
the actuarially smoothed market value of assets as of June 30th
of each fiscal year. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby credits the net earnings of the
Retirement Fund to the Reserves of the Association in the following order:
(a) First on June 30th and December 31st, to Member
Reserves, interest at one-half of the per annum actuarial interest
rate on contributions and interest on deposit for the preceding six months.
(b) Second on June 30th, to the Reserve for Deficiencies in Interest
Earnings and Other Contingencies, established pursuant to GC§31592
Reserve for Deficiencies (Unallocated Fund Balance), the positive
or negative amount necessary to maintain such Reserve at 1% of the fair
market value of the assets in the Retirement Fund.
(c) Third on June 30th, to the Reserve for Deficiencies in Interest
Earnings and Other Contingencies Employer Reserves, the amount
necessary when added to the balance of the current fiscal year's allocation
to equal the employer contributions estimated by the actuary for Medicare
Part-B Premium Reimbursements in the coming fiscal year.
(d) Fourth on June 30th and December 31st, to Employer
Reserves, interest at one-half of the per annum actuarial interest
rate on contributions and interest on deposit for the preceding six months,
except that such credit shall be suspended during periods in which
the estimated semi-annual return on the actuarially smoothed market value
of assets is less than one-half of the per annum actuarial interest rate.
(e) Fifth on June 30th, to Employer Reserves, the positive or
negative balance of net earnings. Be it further
Resolved that the Board hereby authorizes the Chief Executive
Officer to implement the provisions of this resolution and to report semi-annually
on the amounts so credited.
|
| |
|
| 0202.5.7 |
Adoption of Contribution Rates & 401(h) Reserve Contribution for
Fiscal Year 2002/2003: Mr. McCausland recommended that the Board adopt
the contribution rates and Medicare Part-B appropriation recommended by
the actuary.
Motion by Bryan, second by Lewis, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution 01-02-04, Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Contribution Rates,
as follows:
WHEREAS, Government Code §31453 mandates the periodic actuarial
valuation of the Retirement Fund and requires that the Board...shall,
at least 45 days prior to the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year,
recommend to the Board of Supervisors such changes in the rates of interest,
in the rates of contributions of members, and in the county and district
appropriations as are necessary...; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 97-98-11 as amended sets forth the policy
& procedures for SamCERA's Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement Program;
and
WHEREAS, the Board has received, reviewed and approved the reports
and recommendations from its actuary, William M. Mercer, Incorporated,
and the Chief Executive Officer setting forth the changes necessary to
assure the actuarial soundness of the Retirement Fund. Therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Board hereby adopts the actuary's recommended
Employer Contribution Rates for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 for the County and
Mosquito Abatement District in accordance with the following schedule,
as a percentage of salaries, effective July 1, 2002:
| |
Plan 1
|
Plan 2
|
Plan 3
|
Plan 4
|
| General Member Rates: |
|
|
|
|
| Normal Cost |
11.70%
|
10.19%
|
6.18%
|
8.76%
|
| Contribution to Unfunded Accrued Actuarial Liability |
0.85%
|
0.74%
|
0.70%
|
0.57%
|
| Total General Member Rates |
12.55%
|
10.93%
|
6.88%
|
9.33%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Safety Member Rates: |
|
|
|
|
| Normal Cost |
20.01%
|
16.88%
|
None
|
15.43%
|
| Contribution to Unfunded Accrued Actuarial Liability |
1.59%
|
1.55%
|
None
|
1.29%
|
| Total Safety Member Rates |
21.60%
|
18.43%
|
|
16.72%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Probation Member Rates: |
|
|
|
|
| Normal Cost |
24.91%
|
16.33%
|
None
|
13.68%
|
| Contribution to Unfunded Accrued Actuarial Liability |
0.53%
|
1.49%
|
None
|
1.11%
|
| Total Probation Member Rates |
25.44%
|
17.82%
|
|
14.79%
|
Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board, pursuant to Resolution 97-98-11, hereby
(a) certifies that the actuarial funding ratio as of June 30, 2001 exceeded
80%;
(b) requests that the Board of Supervisors contribute $1,340,000 to the
401(h) Reserve for the continuation of the Medicare Part-B Premium Reimbursement
Program through Fiscal Year 2002-2003;
(c) requests that the Board of Supervisors instruct the Controller to
make such contribution as a one-time lump sum deduction from the first
biweekly employer contributions paid in accordance with the contribution
rates set forth above, in an amount equal to the difference between $1,340,000
and the balance remaining in the 401(h) Reserve on July 1, 2002, as certified
by the Chief Executive Officer;
(d) requests that the Board of Supervisors instruct the Controller to
specifically designate in writing at the time of such contribution that
it is being made only to the 401(h) Reserve;
(e) instructs the Chief Executive Officer to transfer to the County Advance
Reserve from excess interest earnings in the Reserve for Deficiencies
in Interest Earnings and Other Contingencies an amount equal to the
net amount contributed to the 401(h) Reserve;
(f) certifies to the Board of Supervisors that the provisions of Resolution
97-98-11 as amended shall govern the management of SamCERA's 401(h) Reserve
program and all County contributions thereto.
Be it further
RESOLVED that the Chief Executive Officer is hereby authorized
to transmit these rates, requests and certifications to the Board of Supervisors
and to take all actions necessary to provide for their implementation
effective July 1, 2002.
Mr. Cottle then took up Agenda Items 6.6, 7.1 and 7.13, which are reported
below.
|
| |
|
| 0202.6 |
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES & INVESTMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT
|
| |
|
| 0202.6.1 |
Acceptance of Monthly Portfolio Performance Report:
Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted Mr. Bryan's recommendation
that the reconciliation of manager performance be moved to the end of
the monthly report format.
Ms. Colson reported that SamCERA's return for January was -1.02%, as
was its benchmark, while for the 12-months ending January 31st the return
was -6.05% vs. -7.96% for the policy benchmark. Market value and performance
for the month ending January 31st were as follows:
|
Asset Class
|
Market Value
|
1-month
|
1-year
TTWRR
|
5-year
TTWRR
|
| Domestic Equity |
$ 627,221,918
|
-1.24%
|
-13.66%
|
7.38%
|
| International Equity |
161,284,865
|
-5.30%
|
-23.02%
|
4.89%
|
| Total Equity |
$ 788,506,783
|
-2.10%
|
-15.77%
|
5.44%
|
| Fixed Income |
397,097,188
|
0.76%
|
-8.29%
|
7.22%
|
| Real Estate |
94,895,626
|
0.55%
|
12.98%
|
8.86%
|
| Cash Equivalents |
5,693,300
|
0.17%
|
3.95%
|
|
| TOTAL FUND |
$1,286,192,896
|
-1.02%
|
-6.05%
|
6.64%
|
| Benchmark |
|
-1.02%
|
-7.96%
|
6.51%
|
Mr. Clifton noted that this month's report includes an analysis of the
actual vs. target asset allocation. He reported that he needs to rebalance
the BGI US Debt Fund as part of a program to generate funds to meet retiree
payroll. He noted that he will need a second draw down as well before
June 30th, but he has not yet determined which account to tap.
Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted the report.
|
| |
|
| 0202.6.2 |
Acceptance of SIS' Performance Analysis for periods
ending 12/31/2001: Ms. Jadallah and Mr. Thomas presented a summary
of SamCERA's investment performance for periods ending December 31st.
Highlights in the Quarterly Report included the following:
| Asset Class |
1-Quarter
|
1-year
TTWRR
|
5-year
TTWRR
|
| Large Cap Equity |
11.11%
|
48
|
-12.43%
|
64
|
10.52%
|
61
|
| Small Cap Equity |
20.98%
|
38
|
2.57%
|
51
|
|
|
| International Equity |
8.23%
|
56
|
-18.38%
|
55
|
4.33%
|
54
|
| Total Equity |
12.05%
|
|
-11.46%
|
|
6.50%
|
|
| Passive Fixed Income |
0.12%
|
46
|
8.64%
|
47
|
7.51%
|
50
|
| Active Fixed Income |
0.11%
|
47
|
9.74%
|
17
|
7.72%
|
33
|
| Total Fixed Income |
0.11%
|
|
9.10%
|
|
6.94%
|
|
| Real Estate |
2.44%
|
22
|
12.36%
|
12
|
8.90%
|
67
|
| Cash Equivalents |
0.68%
|
39
|
4.32%
|
50
|
|
|
| TOTAL FUND |
7.30%
|
34
|
-2.95%
|
58
|
7.23%
|
80
|
| Benchmark |
7.91%
|
22
|
-4.65%
|
79
|
6.90%
|
84
|
The Quarterly Report noted that, with the exception of Bank of Ireland,
SamCERA's managers outperformed their median peer managers for the quarter.
This outperformance reflected the difficulty managers had in recovering
from the market decline that followed the September 11th terrorist
attacks. Bank of Ireland trailed its peers due to its customary underweight
in emerging markets, which experienced an exceptional quarter.
Ms. Colson noted that the Investment Committee had received a comprehensive
presentation of the quarterly report from Ms. Jadallah and Mr. Thomas.
Mr. Bryan thanked SIS for the timely and accurate report. Ms. Colson reported
that the Investment Committee recommended that the Board accept the report.
Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted SIS' Performance Analysis
for periods ending December 31, 2001.
|
| |
|
| 0202.6.3 |
Acceptance of Deutsche Asset Management's Compliance
Certification Statement: Ms. Colson reported that the Investment Committee
had reviewed Deutsche Asset Management's Compliance Certification Statement.
She reported that the Committee had authorized Mr. Clifton to modify the
form to allow managers to indicate when an entire block of questions is
not applicable to their asset class or style. Ms. Colson reported that
the Investment Committee recommended that the Board accept the statement.
Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted Deutsche Asset Management's
Compliance Certification Statement.
|
| |
|
| 0202.6.4 |
Acceptance of Report on the Prepayment of the
County's Contribution for FY 2002-2003: Ms. Colson reported that the
Investment Committee had been advised that the County will be pre-paying
its 2002-2003 contribution on July 12th with a transfer of
$32,600,403. Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted the report.
|
| |
|
| 0202.6.5 |
Introduction of Strategic Objectives Schedule for Fiscal Year 2002/2003:
Ms. Colson reported that the Investment Committee had adopted its schedule
for the coming year after amending it to provide for preparation for the
Annual Planning Meeting and the possible implementation of recommendations
resulting from the asset / liability modeling study in the Spring of 2003.
Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted the report.
|
| |
|
| 0202.6.6 |
Review of the SamCERA's Capital Market and
Inflation Assumptions: In response to an earlier request from Mr.
Lewis, William M. Mercer and Strategic Investment Solutions submitted
descriptions of their capital market assumptions. While the two firms
real rate of return assumptions by asset class are similar, their inflation
assumptions vary significantly. The actuary uses an assumption based on
very long-term trends and currently recommends inflation assumptions between
3.5% and 4.5% to its clients. SamCERA's 4.25% inflation assumption is
at the fiftieth percentile of twenty-four pension funds responding to
the actuary's survey. On the other hand, the investment consultant projects
annual inflation of 2.5% over the next decade. Without objection,
Mr. Cottle accepted the reports.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7 |
BOARD AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES & AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT:
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.01 |
Adoption of Cost of Living Allowance Resolution:
Mr. McCausland noted that the actuary had reported a 5.38% increase
in the Consumer Price Index in the San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose metropolitan
statistical area, which rounds to 5.5% per the '37 Act. Mr. Yeung reviewed
the history of CPI increases over the past five years. He noted that the
calculation is based on the average annual change for the calendar year
divided by the average annual change for the prior calendar year. Mr.
Lewis reported that the Audit Committee had reviewed the actuary's report
and recommended that the Board adopt the cost of living allowance resolution.
Motion by Bryan, second by Stuart, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution 01-02-05, Cost of Living Adjustments effective April
1, 2002, as follows:
WHEREAS, Government Code §31870.1, §31870.2 and §31874.4
empower the Board to grant cost of living adjustments on an annual basis
to recipients of SamCERA benefits; and
WHEREAS, the Board has retained William M. Mercer Incorporated
to provide actuarial services to the Board; and
WHEREAS, William M. Mercer, by its letter of January 25, 2002
has reported that the appropriate annual cost of living adjustment to
be effective April 1, 2002 is 5.5%; and
WHEREAS, William M. Mercer has transmitted an exhibit which sets
forth a schedule of cost of living adjustments based upon applicable plan,
date of retirement and the accumulated carry-over and changes thereto
for those eligible. Therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Board hereby adopts a 5.5% cost of living adjustment
effective April 1, 2002, be it further
RESOLVED, that the Board adopts the schedule of cost of living
adjustments set forth in the William M. Mercer exhibit dated January 24,
2002 and entitled San Mateo County Cost of Living Adjustments as of
April 1, 2002; be it further
RESOLVED, that the Chief Executive Officer is hereby empowered
to take all actions necessary to provide for the payment of cost of living
adjustments in accordance with the adopted schedule effective April 1,
2002.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.02 |
Acceptance of Quarterly Administrative & Professional
Services Budget Report: Mr. Lewis reported that the Audit Committee
had reviewed the budgets in detail.
With 50% of the fiscal year completed, Administrative expenditures are
as follows:
|
Element
|
Expended
|
% Expended
|
Salaries & Benefits
Services & Supplies
Fixed Assets
|
$383,609
190,321
0
|
48.0%
33.1%
0
|
| Total Budget |
$573,930
|
41.1%
|
The $573,930 expended represents 41.1% of the total Administrative Budget
of $1,395,000.
Professional Services expenditures totaled $1,179,830 through December
31st, with total expenditures for the fiscal year projected to be $2,470,000.
A Status Report on SamCERA's Budget Initiatives was included with
the report. Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted the report.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.03 |
Annual Review of SamCERA's
Mission, Goals & Objectives: Mr. Lewis reported that
the Audit Committee had reviewed the resolution and found it adequate.
Mr. Cottle noted that he finds it difficult to conceptualize how the Board
can "manage" the actuarial liabilities and that the "effectiveness
of our services" should be expanded to include delivery of services.
Following a general discussion, Mr. Cottle recommended the amendment reflected
below.
Motion by Cottle, second by Colson, carried eight ayes (Bryan,
Buffington, Colson, Cottle, Lewis, Salas, Stuart & Tonsfeldt) to one
no (McMahon), to amend Resolution 95-96-05, Mission and Goals,
as follows:
WHEREAS, Article XVI, '17(a) of the Constitution of the State
of California states in part that "the retirement board...shall have
plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for investment of monies
and administration of the system...;" &
WHEREAS, Article XVI, '17(b) of the Constitution of the State
of California states in part that "the members of the retirement
board...shall discharge their duties...solely in the interest of, and
for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to, participants and their
beneficiaries, minimizing employer contributions thereto, and defraying
reasonable expenses of administering the system. A retirement board's
duty to its participants and their beneficiaries shall take precedence
over any other duty...;" &
Whereas, Article XVI, '17(c) of the Constitution of the State
of California states in part that "the members of the retirement
board...shall discharge their duties with respect to the system with the
care, skill, prudence, and diligence...a prudent person acting in like
capacity and familiar with these matters would use in the conduct of an
enterprise of like character and with like aims;" &
WHEREAS, Government Code '31520 vests the management of SamCERA
in the Board; &
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to define its mission and goals so as
to direct its efforts and the efforts of its staff in concert with the
spirit of the law. Now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Board hereby adopts the following:
Mission
SamCERA exists
to serve as Loyal Fiduciary for our Members, Retirees and Beneficiaries;
&
to serve as Prudent Administrator of our County's Retirement System.
SamCERA's Goals
To provide caring, fair, accurate, timely and knowledgeable professional
service
to our clients and our public.
To prudently manage the assets and appropriately
fund the actuarial liabilities of
the Retirement System,
so as to minimize the costs to our County, while assuring our ability
to pay all earned benefits.
To constantly improve the effectiveness of our services and the efficiency
of our operations
Be it further
RESOLVED, that the Board hereby agrees, and directs the Retirement
Administrator, to adhere to the principles set forth herein in the management
of the resources of the Association.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.04 |
Annual Review of SamCERA's Strategic Services
Resolution: Mr. Lewis reported that the Audit Committee had reviewed
the resolution and found it an adequate description of the roles of the
Board and staff. Mr. Cottle expressed a desire to have the resolution
reflect the fact that the Board "hires and evaluates investment managers,
consultants and advisers." Following a general discussion, Ms. Tonsfeldt
crafted Mr. Cottle's proposed amendment as reflected below.
Motion by Buffington, second by Cottle, carried unanimously, to
amend Resolution 95-96-06, Strategic Services, as follows:
WHEREAS, Government Code '31520 vests the management of SamCERA
in the Board; &
WHEREAS, Resolution 95-96-05 defines the Board's mission and goals;
&
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to direct its efforts and the efforts
of its staff in concert with the spirit of the law and the Board's Mission
and Goals. Now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Board hereby adopts the following:
Board Responsibilities
- Grant Earned Benefits & Provide for the Disbursement of those
Benefits
- Provide for the Investment & Safekeeping of Retirement Fund Assets
- Assure the Actuarial Soundness of the System
- Establish & Arrange for the Collection of Contributions
- Manage the Association & System in accordance with the Law
- Define Fiduciary & Ministerial Responsibilities and Effectively
Delegate them to
, & Monitor the Performance of,Designated
Fiduciaries
- Select & Monitor the Performance of Designated Fiduciaries,
including but not limited to investment managers, consultants and other
advisors
- Approve & Monitor Internal Controls & Audit Programs
Strategic Staff Services
MEMBER BENEFIT & ACTUARIAL SERVICES
- Implement the Benefit Services Plan, including individual member
counseling
- Establish Eligibility & Process Applications for Membership &
Benefits
- Provide for & Monitor Payment of Benefits & Refunds
- Accurately Maintain & Monitor Member & Benefit Databases
- Provide Timely, Accurate & Useful Services, Reports & Recommendations
for Members, Retirees, Beneficiaries & the Board
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
- Implement the Investment Plan
- Monitor Manager & Custodial Activity
- Project & Monitor Retirement Fund Cash Flows
- Provide Timely, Accurate & Useful Reports & Recommendations
to the Board
BOARD SUPPORT SERVICES
- Faithfully execute the Duties & Responsibilities Delegated by
the Board
- Support the Board in its execution of its Powers & Duties
- Provide Timely, Accurate & Useful Information & Recommendations
to the Board
- Direct the Benefits, Investments & Management Services Programs
- Provide Member Education, Public Information & Inter-Agency Services
- Propose, Implement & Monitor Internal Control Systems
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
- Implement the Management Services Plan, including Human Resources,
Information Systems, Fiscal, Accounting, Analytical, Facilities &
Support Services
- Manage Contracts
- Maintain liaison with providers of County support services
- Direct Catastrophe Recovery Planning
Be it further
RESOLVED, that the Board hereby expresses its intent to review
annually the responsibilities and strategic services set forth herein.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.05 |
Introduction of Strategic Objectives Schedule for
Fiscal Year 2002/2003: Mr. Lewis reported that the Audit Committee
had adopted its schedule for the coming year after amending it to include
an annual review of all counsel relationships, a workshop with the actuary
prior to the commencement of the triennial experience study, a preview
of the actuarial valuation and a review of SamCERA's Risk Management Matrix.
Mr. Lewis noted that the Audit Committee recommends that the Board instruct
the actuary to perform the valuation using more than one actuarial interest
rate. Mr. McCausland recommended that the Board ask for a valuation summary
based on 7.75%, 8% and 8.25% interest assumptions. Without objection,
Mr. Cottle accepted the report and instructed Mr. McCausland to put the
interest assumption item on the March agenda.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.06 |
Introduction of SamCERA's FY 2002/2003 Budget: Mr. Lewis reported
that the Audit Committee had reviewed the basic ingredients for next fiscal
year's budget, including staff's proposed budget initiatives. Mr. Lewis
noted that Salaries & Benefits is projected to increase from $800,000
to $854,000; Services & Supplies is projected to increase from $575,000
to $706,000; and Fixed Assets is projected to increase from $20,000 to
$40,000. Total expenditures are projected to increase from $1,395,000
to $1,600,000.
Mr. Lewis reported that the Committee had reviewed the Services &
Supplies budget in detail and carefully examined the County Services budget
of $251,800. It was noted that Employee & Public Services charges
SamCERA for 75% of the time of the individual who manages the County's
health benefit insurance enrollments, based on a claim that while active
employees can enroll through their payroll clerks, all retirees receive
all of their health benefits services from this one EPS employee. Mr.
Lewis reported that the Committee had concluded that the law permits the
Retirement Fund to be used for the payment of SamCERA benefits and the
administrative costs associated with those SamCERA benefits. However,
the law does not authorize expenditures from the Retirement Fund to pay
for the administration of another County program. Mr. McCausland reported
that he had advised the Director of EPS of the Audit Committee's concerns.
Mr. Clifton noted that Salaries & Benefits includes an upgrade of
the Senior Accountant position to Financial Services Manager as well as
overtime for special projects. However, it does not include funds for
any contracts that may be negotiated in October with the unions. He noted
that the fiduciary insurance premium had been based on a triennial premium,
but will now be budgeted annually. He noted that the budget as submitted
does not provide for relocation of the office. If the Board decides to
relocate, a budget amendment will be required. Mr. McCausland noted that
the Board only pays for medical evaluations when the Board or the Medical
Adviser ask for one. Mr. Clifton noted that most trustees had completed
their expensive education courses, so that the Education & Conference
expense is projected to decline, though increased transportation and lodging
costs offset that savings. Mr. Clifton advised the Board that he will
be submitting the budget in a new comprehensive format that is more appropriate
for a fund of SamCERA's size. Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted
the report.
Mr. Buffington left the meeting at this point and Ms. Arnott assumed
his seat on the Board. [Mr. Buffington was present for 7.13 which was
acted on earlier in the meeting.]
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.07 |
Annual Review and Revision of Code of Fiduciary Conduct:
Mr. Lewis reported that the Committee was requesting that Counsel
review the Code to see if she would recommend any amendments. Without
objection, Mr. Cottle instructed Ms. Carlson to review the Code
for the Board.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.08 |
Annual Review and Revision of Conflict of Interest Code:
Mr. Lewis reported that the Committee had reviewed the Code and recommends
adoption of the amendment deleting Gray & Company from the list of
designated fiduciaries. Motion by Colson, second by Salas, carried
unanimously, to amend Resolution 98-99-15, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Board has adopted a Code of Fiduciary Conduct
which requires among other things, that Trustees, the Chief Executive
Officer, Consultants, Investment Managers and other professionals retained
by the Board and SamCERA Staff shall comply with the provisions of the
California Constitution; the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended...and
all other laws pertinent to the conduct of public pension fund fiduciaries;
and
WHEREAS, Government Code §87300 mandates the adoption of
a Conflict of Interest Code by independent public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Board, by Resolution 96-97-03, adopted the Conflict
of Interest Code provisions of California Fair Political Practices
Commission (FPPC) Regulation 18730; and
WHEREAS, Government Code §87306.5 mandates that the Board
review its designation of employees and disclosure categories
from time to time. Therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Board hereby redefines SamCERA's List of
Designated Individuals and Disclosure Categories per FPPC Regulation
18730, to read as follows:
LIST OF DESIGNATED INDIVIDUALS AND APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE
CATEGORIES
Each individual holding a Designated Position must file FPPC Form
700--Statement of Economic Interests disclosing the applicable financial
interests indicated for the position in accordance with Government Code
§87200, et seq.
| DESIGNATED POSITIONS |
APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
|
| Trustees & Designated Alternate Trustees |
1,2,3,4
|
| Chief Executive Officer |
1,2,3,4
|
| Assistant Executive Officer/Benefits Manager |
1,2,3,4
|
| Investment and Finance Manager |
1,2,3,4
|
| Information Technology Manager |
1,2,3,4
|
| Consultants specifically identified to file by the Board
of Retirement |
1,3,4
|
| Real Estate Consultants specifically identified to file
by the Board of Retirement |
1,2,3,4
|
Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby adopts the following
DESCRIPTION OF FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
Category 1: Investments that may be materially affected by any
decision made or participated in by the designated individual must be
disclosed on Schedules A-1 &/or A-2 of Form 700.
Category 2: Interests in Real Property that may be materially
affected by any decision made or participated in by the designated individual
must be disclosed on Schedules B &/or C of Form 700. If the designated
individual is a trustee, designated alternate trustee, or SamCERA Staff
member, disclosure is only required on real property located in the County
of San Mateo.
Category 3: Income that may be materially affected by any decision
made or participated in by the designated individual must be disclosed
on Schedules C, D, E, &/or F of Form 700.
Category 4: A Business Entity in which the designated individual
is a director, officer, partner, trustee, or holds any position of management
that may be materially affected by any decision made or participated in
by the designated individual must be disclosed on Schedule C of FPPC Form
700. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board, in concert with the opinion of the FPPC,
defines as consultants specifically identified to file by the Board
of Retirement "employees and principals who provide services
to the Board, with influence over the investment decisions pertaining
to the Retirement Fund and in positions that involve the making or participation
in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect
on any reportable financial interest". Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes the Chief Executive
Officer to instruct the following firms to identify employees and principals
who meet the definition of consultant set forth above: Bank of Ireland
Asset Management (U.S.) Limited, Barclays Global Investors, INVESCO Realty
Advisors, Deutsche Asset Management, Gray & Company Investment
Consulting and Strategic Investment Solutions. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby instructs the Chief Executive Officer
to provide for annual disclosure by all individuals in the Designated
Positions. Each individual holding a Designated Position must
file the original Form 700 with the Chief Executive Officer who must make
and retain a copy and forward the original to the County Clerk who must
make and retain a copy and forward the original to the FPPC. Form 700
must be filed at the times and on the forms prescribed by law. Failure
to file statements on time may result in penalties, including but not
limited to late fines. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby instructs the Chief Executive Officer
to implement a program to provide reasonable assurance that foreseeable
potential conflict of interest situations will be disclosed and prevented
and to provide each affected person with a clear and specific statement
of his or her duties under the Conflict of Interest Code. Be it further
RESOLVED that the Board hereby instructs the Chief Executive Officer
to supply the necessary forms and manuals, to monitor timely and complete
filing compliance, to take action regarding late filings and to report
apparent violations of the Conflict of Interest Code to the Board.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.09 |
Annual Review and Revision of Internal Controls Policy:
Mr. Lewis reported that the Committee had continued the review of
the policy until its next meeting at his request, so that he might devote
more time to its review.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.10 |
Acceptance of Audit Services Survey: Mr. Lewis reported that the
Audit Committee had accepted the results of the audit services survey.
Mr. Clifton noted the survey indicated that most systems complete their
financial statements between twelve and eighteen weeks following the end
of the fiscal year. SamCERA's auditors want to be finished within eight
weeks. He noted that staff would cooperate to the fullest extent, but
could not complete portions of the financial statements until the information
is available from the Board's managers, consultants and actuary.
Mr. Lewis reported that the Committee had expressed grave concerns about
the fact that the auditor had contacted SamCERA's actuary directly and
asked him if he could perform the actuarial valuation based on April 30th
rather than June 30th data. Mr. Cottle expressed the
Board's displeasure with the Controller's preferred schedule infringing
on matters that are clearly under the Board's jurisdiction. Mr. Bryan
recalled that last year the Committee had advised the Controller that
it had concerns about the accelerated audit schedule. Mr. Lewis noted
that the Committee had instructed him to send a letter to the Controller
expressing the Committee's concern. Mr. Cottle agreed to co-sign the letter.
Mr. Lewis also reported that the Committee had instructed staff to take
control of the schedule. Mr. Clifton noted that last year's transition
to the new audit team had gone smoothly, but that the audit manager has
made it clear that the scope of the audit will be much narrower than SamCERA
had come to expect in past years. Mr. Cottle noted that after this discussion,
he would be quite surprised if the Board does not issue an RFP for the
June 30, 2003 audit. Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted the
report.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.11 |
Acceptance of Real Estate Financial Reports and KPMG's Independent
Auditor's Report Thereon: Mr. Lewis reported that the Audit Committee
had reviewed the annual financial statements of June 30, 2001 for each
of SamCERA's properties. All were unqualified and standard. Mr. Lewis
reported that the Audit Committee recommended that the Board accept the
reports. Without objection, Mr. Cottle accepted the Real Estate
Financial Reports and KPMG's Independent Auditor's Report Thereon.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.12 |
Authorization for Chief Executive Officer to contract for a Pension
Management Software Study: Mr. Lewis reported that the Audit Committee
had reviewed the staff recommendation to retain Linea Solutions to evaluate
SamCERA's benefits administration platform resources and needs. Mr. Hood
reported that the study will evaluate the components of SamCERA's PensionGold
Version 1 system and evaluate the pros and cons of migrating to Version
2 or another platform. Mr. Cottle observed that the Campbell proposal
appeared to have more levels to the study and the Linea proposal seemed
to stop short of evaluating Version 2. Mr. Hood noted that the two proposals
get to the same deliverables via different routes. Ms. Carlson suggested
that the contract language be amended to be more specific about what will
be delivered.
Motion by Lewis, second by McMahon, carried unanimously, to authorize
the Chief Executive Officer to enter into a contract with Linea Solutions
for a cost not to exceed $9,500 subject to County Counsel's approval of
the contract.
|
| |
|
| 0202.7.13 |
Authorization for Special Actuarial Study of the Ventura Contingent
Liability: Mr. Lewis reported that Mr. Buffington had suggested during
the January Planning Meeting that it might be appropriate to determine
the cost of Teamsters Local 856 litigation based on the Superior
Court ruling. Mr. Lewis noted that the Committee is bringing the item
forward to the Board to see if the Board has an interest in conducting
a study at this time.
In response to questions from Mr. Buffington and Mr. Cottle, Ms. Carlson
noted that the Appellate briefing may be done by the end of 2002, but
that there is no indication of when the item will be on the Court's calendar
for oral argument.
Ms. Carlson indicated that the Board should decide what, if anything,
it needs to determine at this point, since the Superior Court judgment
has been stayed and, therefore, has neither force nor effect. She noted
that in Counties that have settled Ventura, there has been no relationship
between the cost of the judgment and the value of the settlement. Mr.
Bryan indicated that he believed that a second study would be required
to determine the cost of a settlement. Mr. McCausland noted that if the
current ruling stands, a second study will not be needed because the population
eligible for a retroactive benefit is clearly defined in the ruling.
Mr. McCausland noted that he found Mr. Buffington's suggestion intriguing
because this may be the year when the Board will need to consider using
surplus funds in the Ventura Contingency Reserve to help the County
with a direct offset for the increased contributions that will be associated
with the amortization of the negative balances in the market stabilization
account. Mr. Scannell noted that if the Board would step up to the plate
and help the County, he would support the study, otherwise it is likely
to be a duplicate effort. Mr. Bryan noted that any action the Board takes
would have to be in the best interest of the members. Mr. McCausland noted
that there was no question about that, but that many ingredients go into
looking out for the best interest of the members, and since this is a
difficult time for both the Fund and the County unique opportunities may
emerge.
Mr. Buffington noted that the study would pay for itself if it made it
possible to decrease the amount of non-valuation assets while increasing
the amount of valuation assets.
Motion by Lewis, second by Buffington, carried six ayes (Buffington,
Colson, Cottle, Lewis, McMahon & Stuart) to three noes (Bryan, Salas
& Tonsfeldt), to authorize William M. Mercer to perform a Special
Actuarial Study of the Ventura Contingent Liability based upon
the terms of the Superior Court ruling in Teamsters Local 856 for
a cost not to exceed $25,000.
|
| |
|
| 0202.8 |
APPROVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF REPORTS:
|
| |
|
| 0202.8.1 |
Report of Actions Taken in Closed Session: None.
|
| |
|
| 0202.8.2 |
Chief Executive Officer's Report: Mr. McCausland reported that
all who retired on or after March 27, 2001 and who also participated in
the County's Voluntary Time Off program will receive retroactive adjustments
to their March 31, 2002 SamCERA benefit. He reported that Mr. Hood had
successfully imported all VTO hours for active members since the 9/15/91
inception of the County's Personnel and Payroll Information System into
PensionGold. He also reported that staff is completing its review
of the individual files and selected microfiche records for 133 retirees
who may be eligible for the VTO adjustment. As of this date 69 eligible
retirees with VTO hours have been identified.
|
| |
|
| 0202.8.3 |
County Counsel's Report: Ms. Carlson reported that Judge Pollack
had heard arguments regarding attorney's fees for the plaintiffs in Teamsters
856 and would issue his ruling soon. Mr. McCausland noted that the
Board's authorization to file a Notice of Appeal of the ruling in the
case extended to Ms. Carlson the authority to appeal the fees as well.
Ms. Carlson noted that she will forward a copy of the relevant sections
of the Brown Act governing meetings to all trustees so that the Committees
can be sure they conduct their meetings in accordance with the Act.
|
| |
|
| 0202.8.4 |
Investment & Finance Manager's Report: Mr. Clifton reminded
the Board that FPPC Form 700 should be filed as soon as possible.
|
| |
|
| 0202.8.5 |
Information Technology Manager's Report: Mr. Hood reported that
he had imported 130 years of VTO service credit with the initial download
of historical PIPS records from 1991 forward. He noted that the last biweekly
payroll included approximately 1,000 hours of VTO service for 77 members.
He hopes that PensionGold will be able to accept the biweekly PIPS
VTO hours automatically by the end of the next pay period.
|
| |
|
| 0202.9 |
Adjournment in Memory of the following Deceased Members: There
being no further business, Mr. Cottle adjourned the meeting at 4:41 p.m.
in memory of the following recently deceased members:
| JOHNSON, LA VERNE |
SEPTEMBER 21, 2001
|
CONTROLLERS' OFFICE
|
| MOUW, MILDRED |
OCTOBER 28, 2001
|
MENTAL HEALTH
|
| SILLIMAN, CLAIRE |
OCTOBER 30, 2001
|
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
|
| MC GAFF, RUTH |
NOVEMBER 24, 2001
|
SOCIAL SERVICES
|
| CALLAGHAN, LEAH |
DECEMBER 16, 2001
|
LIBRARY
|
| WOOD, ARTHUR |
JANUARY 2, 2002
|
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
|
| HEINER, JANE |
JANUARY 13, 2002
|
BENEFICIARY OF ARNOLD
|
| PATE, IVORY |
JANUARY 17, 2002
|
CRYSTAL SPRINGS REHAB CENTER
|
| STEGEMAN, GRACE |
JANUARY 20, 2002
|
SOCIAL SERVICES
|
| FAIRBANKS,VERLE |
JANUARY 21, 2002
|
ROADS & ENGINEERS
|
| FINNEY, MILDRED |
JANUARY 25, 2002
|
BENEFICIARY OF SAMUEL
|
| WOONACOTT, DOLORES |
JANUARY 25, 2002
|
GENERAL HOSPITAL
|
| SUMNER, JACK |
FEBRUARY 3, 2002
|
PARKS & RECREATION
|
|